A survey by Crop - branding for the AI era
Ten findings from UK founders and marketing leaders on how AI is used in their marketing, and who is checking it stays on brand.
The full report, free. No email wall.
Sixteen pages: ten findings, the verdict, what people told us, and three things to do this week.
Download the report (PDF)We could have put this behind a form. We didn't. If it's useful, pass it on.
The survey is still open. Not had your two minutes yet? Have your say, anonymously. Or see the live results as they stand today.
Want the next one before anyone else?
There's a Crop letter now and then. Content is ten a penny, so we only send what we'd want to read ourselves. Either way, the findings are below.
One click to stop. Your address goes nowhere else.
What does it mean to define, deliver and defend a brand in the AI era? Brands are hard to build and easy to kill. What tools and processes do founders and CEOs need to balance the pros and cons? How can we be sure activity isn't being confused with progress: that AI is building brand muscle, not fuelling a sugar rush?
Ten findings from UK founders and marketing leaders, October 2026. The same findings, designed for passing round, are in the PDF.
Finding 01 of 10 / AI in your marketing
use AI in their marketing. 58% use it every day.
Is AI used in your marketing? One dot per percentage point.
Yes, every day 58%Yes, sometimes 36%Not officially, but I'd bet it is 6%No 0%
What we make of itThe debate about whether to use AI in marketing is over. Not one person said no. The debate about how, and who is checking, is only just starting.
Finding 02 of 10 / The upside
say AI has made their marketing more productive. Only 47% say more creative.
Agree or disagree?
DisagreeStrongly disagreeAgreeStrongly agreeThe rest said don't know.
What we make of itFour in ten say AI has not made their marketing more creative. Productivity is the easy win. Sameness is the bill that arrives later.
Finding 03 of 10 / The upside
can prove AI has made their marketing more effective. 52% think so but have no numbers.
What we make of itMore output is not the same as more results. Most people are running on a feeling, and the feeling is good. The numbers are not in the room.
Finding 04 of 10 / The checks
say AI-assisted marketing goes out without a senior person signing it off every time.
What we make of itFor 38%, the only check on AI-assisted content is the person who prompted it. Output has scaled. Checking has not.
Finding 05 of 10 / The checks
have had AI-assisted content go off brand. 38% actually published it.
Has anything AI-assisted gone out off brand, or nearly?
Yes, more than once 24%Yes, and it was published 14%Yes, but we caught it 10%Not that I know of 48%We'd have no way of knowing 3%
What we make of itThis is not a hypothetical risk. A quarter have published something off brand more than once. The tools arrived faster than the process.
Finding 06 of 10 / The checks
founders say nothing has gone wrong. 9 of 10 marketing heads say it has.
Has anything AI-assisted gone out off brand?
Yes, something went out off brandNo way of knowingNot that I know of
What we make of itSame companies, same AI, different view from the top. Founders are five times as likely as their marketing heads to be completely confident last month was on brand.
Finding 07 of 10 / The checks
are confident everything published under their brand last month was on brand
have had AI-assisted content go out off brand, or nearly
Same 29 people. Only 21% have a senior person sign off every time.
What we make of itMost are confident. Half have already been burned. Only one in five has a senior sign-off every time. The confidence is not coming from the process.
Finding 08 of 10 / The stakes
worry about sounding like everyone else. Getting something wrong in public is fifth.
What we make of itLeaders are less afraid of a public mistake than of quietly becoming indistinguishable. Anyone can copy features. Nobody can copy how a brand makes people feel.
Finding 09 of 10 / The upside
say AI has saved on headcount or hires they didn't make. 79% say it has saved time more than money.
What we make of itMost of the saving is time. But more than one in three say AI has already replaced a role or a hire, and as many again have cut agency and freelance spend.
Finding 10 of 10 / The stakes
say the bigger risk is moving too slowly with AI. 17% say moving too fast without checks. 48% say both.
Which is the bigger risk to your brand right now?
Moving too slowly with AI 31%Both, equally 48%Moving too fast without checks 17%Don't know 3%
What we make of itNobody wants to slow down, and they shouldn't have to. The answer is checks that run at the same speed as the tools.
The verdict
Four of the questions score each person's guardrails: who signs off, whether anything has gone wrong, whether the brand guidelines reach the tools, and how confident they are. Of the 27 who completed the survey:
Checks happen, if at all, when someone remembers. Guidelines have never met the tools.
Someone is looking. By hand, when there is time, which is not every time.
Guidelines loaded, sign-off in place, and you can say so with a straight face.
What we make of itThis is where most brands are right now, and it is not a criticism. The tools arrived faster than the process did. But a brand is a promise kept every time, and at the speed of AI, every time is a lot of times. Take the survey to get your own verdict.
In their words
Anonymous answers, lightly edited for length. Roles and company sizes as given.
All my clients use AI. They didn't write their website; they got AI to do it. We spend hours rewriting whatever we are sent so that it eventually passes the AI-detection test. Because they saved themselves 30 minutes.Agency owner, 2 to 10 people
Logo replication in an AI-designed image was awful. We now no longer use AI for design purposes.Marketing director, 250+ people
Only ever use it as a first pass, to break procrastination or writer's block, and then a final sanity check. The first pass is nowhere near the end result in terms of tone, brand message and differentiation, which is why I don't let it run anything autonomously.Founder, 2 to 10 people
Off message. Obvious AI.Director, 11 to 50 people
What to do about it
Three things to do this week. None of them cost anything.
A named senior pair of eyes, not the person who prompted it.
Prompts, custom instructions, templates.
Ten recent pieces against your guidelines. One hour.
Please share this. If you quote it, say "the Crop survey, October 2026" and link here. The survey is still open and the findings are updated as the numbers grow.
Crop is the branding agency for the AI era. We define brands, deliver everything they need, and defend them: your guidelines built into the tools, and checks that run at the speed of AI. How we work.
36 UK founders and marketing leaders took part between late September and early October 2026; 27 completed every question. Percentages are of those who answered each question. Respondents came from Crop's own network, so this is a snapshot of a marketing-literate crowd, not a representative sample. The survey is still open and the findings will be updated as the numbers grow. Quotes are anonymous and lightly edited for length.